Delivering ROI: Skills and Learning and Development Strategy at Boehringer Ingelheim

Corporate universities are nothing new. For decades, they’ve served as symbols of prestige and places where senior executives sharpen their leadership skills. But at Boehringer Ingelheim, the “university” concept has been reimagined as a global ecosystem serving every one of the company’s 54,000 employees.

At the centre of this transformation is Martin Hess, Chief Learning Officer and Head of Boehringer Ingelheim University. His remit spans everything from skills-based learning and culture-building, to global vendor management and ROI. The common thread? Moving learning from the periphery to the heart of business strategy.

Boehringer Ingelheim’s “University” isn’t a campus—it’s a company-wide operating model for learning. Under Martin, the University functions as a strategic “roof brand” that unifies dozens of local learning units across regions and functions. The aim is simple and ambitious: one ecosystem that serves all 54,000 employees, not just senior leaders, with both virtual and face-to-face opportunities accessible through a single “virtual campus.

A federated model that scales without diluting relevance

Rather than centralising everything, Boehringer Ingelheim runs a federated model: roughly 500 people around the business create and curate content. This keeps learning close to real work while a lightweight alignment mechanism ensures offerings map to enterprise and functional strategies. The centre provides the platform, standards, and governance; local teams contribute context and speed. The result is breadth without bloat: global consistency where it matters, local fit where it counts.

Anchoring learning in skills

Martin tells us that, two years ago, Boehringer Ingelheim introduced a skills-based approach at enterprise scale. Every employee was prompted to build a skills profile, and the system’s AI surfaced an initial skills map. The exercise did more than populate a database: it shifted mindsets. People began to “think in skills” across geographies, levels, and job families, creating a common language that travels well inside a complex organisation.

A pivotal move came next: connecting those skills to strategy. Business leaders identified the capabilities required over the next 12–24 months; aggregated skills data from teams was then compared to those targets. The gap analysis gave direction at every level. Leaders could articulate clear expectations (e.g., target proficiency levels by a given date), and individuals could see their starting point and path forward. That clarity pulled learning out of the “nice-to-have” category and into the weekly operating rhythm.

Avoiding the “now what?” trap

Many organisations stall after skills mapping. Martin tells us that this wasn’t the case for Boehringer Ingelheim. He says that the organisation’s LXP uses each person’s skills profile to recommend focused learning assets; teams get curated pathways aligned to agreed capability goals; leaders receive aggregated insights rather than individual data, preserving trust while enabling decision-making. This closes the loop from intent to action and makes progress visible.

Getting serious about ROI

Martin is candid about a widely shared challenge: most HR and L&D teams avoid ROI because the data is thin and the formulae fall apart. Boehringer tackled a measurable slice first—external learning spend—by implementing global learning vendor management. All purchases for training, coaching, and content now flow through one mechanism co-designed with Sourcing. The short-term reaction in countries wasn’t enthusiastic; the medium-term benefits were unequivocal.

Consolidation delivered three wins:

1. Transparency

Country HR and the central team can see who’s buying what, where, and why, finally enabling portfolio steering.

2. Quality and price

Aggregating similar needs drives better vendor selection and materially better rates.

3. Credibility with Finance

With comparable, year-on-year cost and volume data, L&D can show how much more the company receives for fewer euros.

This doesn’t “solve” ROI for everything L&D does, and Martin doesn’t claim it does. But it reframes the dialogue: measurable efficiencies in external spend underwrite the freedom to invest in higher-value, harder-to-quantify areas like culture, leadership, and innovation.

As Martins says: “Those numbers give us permission to operate in less quantifiable areas.”

AI and hyper-personalised learning

Boehringer’s next horizon is hyper-personalisation. The vision: AI-enabled real-time curation and real-time content generation that produces an individualised “prescription” for each employee’s upskilling needs. For a 54,000-person company, that’s not a marginal improvement; it’s a structural shift. L&D operating models, roles, and governance will need to evolve accordingly, from programme scheduling to orchestration, from content production to experience design and quality assurance.

Martin frames this not as hype but as near-term reality. The organisation has already built the foundations: a unified platform, a shared skills language, federated creators, measurable efficiencies, and a leadership habit of aligning learning with strategy. Hyper-personalisation builds on each of those bricks.

Five practical lessons for global Learning leaders

Boehringer’s approach offers five practical lessons for global learning leaders:

Make the university a system, not a site. Use a unifying brand and platform to bring everything together but keep creation close to the business with a federated model.

Operationalise skills, don’t just catalogue them. Map enterprise strategy to capabilities, compare to aggregated skills data, and set explicit targets. Let that drive curation and pathways.

Close the “so what?” loop. Ensure your LXP and operating cadence convert skills intent into prioritised learning and visible progress.

Pick a measurable ROI area. External spend is often the fastest route to credible numbers. Use those savings and insights to fund and protect higher-order work.

Upgrade the L&D capability stack. Data literacy, vendor management, and finance partnership aren’t side quests, instead they’re core competencies for the modern function.

Boehringer Ingelheim’s experience is a reminder that L&D’s influence grows when it behaves like part platform, part consultancy, and part product organisation—anchored in the business and accountable for outcomes.

Or, as Martin puts it “we align learning to business goals.” Everything else flows from there.

Related Resources

Thumbnail: 
News category: 
Learning & Development

More Insights

Data-driven decision-making, personalisation, and measuring impact to enhance learner engagement were hot topics at iVentiv’s Learning Futures Basel event in October of this year.

Adam Lacey, Co-Founder of Assemble You and Host of the L&D Challenges Podcast took the time to join us for those discussions, and got into the thick it with key thought-leaders in his most recent podcast episode: How Roche and STMicroelectronics are Harnessing the Power of Data and AI in L&D.

Sam Zalcman, Global Head of Learning & Development at STMicroelectronics, Priyakumar Nair, Global Head of Learning Services at Roche, and Professor Peter Fisher, Associate Professor of Marketing & Academic Director of Creative Destruction Labs’ AI stream at HEC Paris made up this episode’s panel of distinguished leaders, and the discussions illuminated cutting-edge strategies in L&D and their implications for organisational transformation.

Join us as we listen in on a podcast that provides a wealth of insights for C-suite executives in multinational organisations, focusing on how L&D leaders are leveraging data, AI, and cultural shifts to address modern challenges.

In a dynamic and transformative era, the Learning & Development sector is grappling with profound questions about innovation, technology, and leadership. The Learning Hack Podcast, hosted by John Helmer, offers rich insights into these themes through candid conversations with global leaders. 

In a recent episode inspired by conversations at iVentiv’s Learning Futures Basel Executive Knowledge Exchange, three thought leaders — Anne-Valérie Corboz (Dean, HEC Paris), Jane Underwood (Global Head of Learning, Reckitt), and Sarah Otley (SVP, Global Head of Akkodis Academy) — came together to share their perspectives on navigating the future of L&D, with discussions covering the evolving nature of leadership, the role of generative AI in L&D, and the enduring challenges of aligning learning strategies with business goals. 

Read more

The advent of generative AI has sparked widespread discussions across industries, but for Learning and Development, its potential remains a double-edged sword.

On the one hand, for many leaders, AI promises to revolutionise the way learning is designed and delivered. On the other, it risks reinforcing old habits and hindering meaningful change.

In a recent episode of The Learning Hack Podcast, hosted by John Helmer, guest Charles Jennings— iVentiv Advisory Board member, regular iVentiv Event Chair, pioneer in L&D transformation, and Co-Founder of the 70:20:10 framework—offered deep insights into these challenges.

This blog unpacks the key themes from their conversation and asks how can L&D leaders avoid complacency? How can they leverage AI responsibly? How can they refocus on performance improvement over outdated methodologies?

Read more

In an age of constant change, Zurich Insurance has embraced a skills-based approach as a core strategy to future-proof its workforce and drive business success. 

In an interview with iVentiv, Adrian Stäubli, Group Head of Skills Development Solutions at Zurich Insurance, highlighted Zurich’s commitment to identifying, developing, and deploying skills across its global workforce. 

This model isn’t just a tool— to Adrian it’s a "secret ingredient" that touches every aspect of employee development, from career progression to job design, setting Zurich apart as a truly agile and resilient organisation.

Watch our interview now to see how Adrian has embraced skills, and how it’s transforming Zurich’s employee experience.

 

In the ever-evolving world of executive education and corporate learning, partnerships are key to success. iVentiv has nurtured a long-standing relationship with HEC Paris, a prestigious European business school that was founded in 1888, since 2010 and has become a leading institution in Executive Development. Through this collaboration, HEC Paris has not only elevated its presence within the corporate learning community but has also provided valuable insights and support to iVentiv’s events worldwide.

Join us as we dive into the partnership between iVentiv and HEC Paris, how it's bloomed over the years, and where it will go next.

In today’s complex global landscape, even the most experienced L&D executives face a persistent challenge: ensuring alignment and collaboration within large Learning & Development teams spread across geographies, business units, and time zones.

Too often, L&D functions in multinational companies operate in silos. Teams set objectives independently, repeat each other’s work unknowingly, or miss opportunities to scale successful initiatives. Despite good intentions, the lack of structured knowledge-sharing and alignment can hinder progress, dilute impact, and ultimately affect how well organisations respond to change. 

So, how do you create an event designed to build a strong, connected L&D team that learns from each other and works towards a shared vision? Read on to find out.

Whether you’re launching a new initiative, or planning a team-building day, internal corporate events need more than just good food and a decent venue. Without the right strategic groundwork, even the most beautifully executed event can fall flat. 

Instead, before diving into logistics, you should pause and ask the foundational questions that shape a purposeful, effective experience.

This guide explores the key questions to ask before you start planning an internal event to help you clarify objectives, understand your audience, and align the event with your broader organisational goals. Read more.

When done right, events designed for small groups (typically between 20 and 50 participants) can lead to deeper connections, richer conversations, and more meaningful outcomes. In a world full of overstimulated conferences and overcrowded rooms, intimate gatherings offer a refreshing opportunity to slow down and engage in real dialogue.

In this guide, you’ll find out how to plan powerful small-group events with intention, from designing sessions that spark genuine collaboration, to nailing the logistics that make all the difference. Read more here.

Organising an internal corporate event should be straight forward. After all it’s just a room full of colleagues, some snacks and a bit of knowledge sharing. Until the caterers don’t show up, half the team forgets to RSVP, the chairs are double booked for another meeting, the facilitator veers wildly off topic, people scroll their phones and then slip out early. And something that was supposed to energise the team does quite the opposite. 

If you’ve ever experienced this, you’re not alone. Internal events often fall short – not because the intentions are wrong, but because the planning is. Here’s how to avoid the common traps and make your internal event one that people want to attend and actually benefit from. Read on.
 

Planning a corporate event might sound simple, but creating something truly engaging and impactful takes careful thought. For Learning & Development teams, particularly in large, global organisations, it’s easy for events to fall flat: too generic, too passive, and too disconnected from daily challenges.

This complete guide explores how to design internal events that do more than fill calendars – they foster collaboration, spark conversation, and drive change. Whether virtual, hybrid or in-person, the key lies in co-creation, clarity of purpose, and designing for participation.

Read about how you can create events your team won’t just attend, but will genuinely look forward to.

Pages